header image
 

May link roundup

Some more interesting things from the intertubes.

A page of examples of good typography - some beautiful stuff on here.

A story from BBC News about the problems caused to marine ecosystems when foreign species get transported in the ballast water of large ships and then released. The proposed solution? A big fuck-off microwave.

Also from BBC News: it turns out there could be intelligent life on other planets after all. We know this because the Vatican said so. It’s funny how the Vatican employ a Chief Astronomer. It makes me wonder what other unexpected contributions the Vatican makes to the world of cold, hard scientific fact.

From Cracked.com, the site that carried the article about those psychological experiments, two more vaguely interesting things: the 6 most frequently quoted bullshit statistics (if you live in America maybe - but worth a read nonetheless) and the 7 greatest home-shopping screwups of all time. If you think how cringe-making those channels are to watch when everything’s going according to plan, well imagine what happens when they fuck up. This one is really funny. Maria, you should show it to your home shopping channel presenter friend.

In the same vein, but not as funny this side of the pond, ten on-camera meltdowns by (American) TV presenters

Freesat is now live, meaning that Channel 4, E4 and More 4 are now being broadcast free-to-air on Astra 2D. Channel 5 is expected to follow. If you live in Ireland, this is a big deal as it saves you having to either pay money or erect a massive aerial in order to receive British TV channels.

From The Escapist magazine, Zero Punctuation’s review of Grand Theft Auto IV. If you’ve never watched one of these before, I recommend you start with the previous week’s, which is a review of some of the hate-mail received about the previous week’s review. It’s even funnier.

Finally, from b3ta.com, some suggested additions to the Uxbridge English Dictionary in honour of the late Humphrey Lyttelton.

Smoking - it’s for fags

The title of the post is taken from a hand-drawn poster that I saw hanging up in Splone O’Phúláin’s house in Dublin many years ago.

As I have been telling anyone and everyone, I quit smoking about three weeks ago. The reason I’m telling people is because unlike on the various other occasions when I thought I would stop smoking, I know it is a permanent decision this time. The secondary reason for telling people is so that if I ever should smoke another cigarette (in circumstances that are currently inconceivable to me) there will be more people to have a go at me about it.

The main reason I know this attempt to give up smoking will succeed and therefore consider it worthy of mention is that I read The Easy Way To Stop Smoking by (the late) Allen Carr. In this book, Carr systematically points out the logical flaws in all of the common justifications for smoking cigarettes and talks up the benefits of a life without smoking.

It’s not especially well-written, nor does it contain any great insight that the average smoker couldn’t come up with themselves over a few years of smoking. Neither of these detract from its effectiveness though. The value of the book, in my opinion, is that it outlines a clear path to giving up, it explains convincingly why it works and why other ways you may have tried previously do not. Although it may have occurred to you before, seeing it in print and knowing that it has worked for millions of people inspire the confidence to try it. You don’t want to be the loser it didn’t work on.

The main message of the book could be summed up in one sentence: if you feel like you’re actually missing out on something, you will never succeed in giving up smoking. This is why what he calls the “willpower method” (i.e. simple self-denial, the way most people try to give up smoking) is doomed to failure.

People attempting to stop smoking in this manner wake up each morning and think “Oh, I’d love a cigarette now but I can’t have one. That’d be bad. No no no. No cigarettes for me”. This thought continues to nag at them throughout the day, every day. Sooner or later, they go to the pub with all their friends who are smoking, and they crack. At least, this is a typical way that I would crack. There are many others.

I can honestly say that even as I write this the thought of actually smoking is not on mind. It will continue to pop into my head occasionally for some time to come as I go places and do things where I might have smoked in the past. However it is a simple mental association. When I see other people smoking, I don’t feel any sense of longing. I am as surprised about all of this as anyone.

I never smoked enough in the first place to experience some of the alleged benefits such as an improvement in my ability to taste food or having lots of extra energy, but the simple satisfaction of no longer being addicted to something I never wanted to be addicted to is more than enough reward.

One of the great truisms we’ve all heard about giving up smoking is that “to give up smoking, you have to really want to give up“. There’s actually a bit more to it than that. You have to make the logical leap from “I know it might give me cancer but I really enjoy it” to “Hang on, I don’t even enjoy it“. There are obviously other ways of arriving at this conclusion besides reading Carr’s book- anyone who has successfully given up without the use of patches, chewing gum etc. (which Carr is very down on) has managed to do so.

I also now understand why there’s nothing worse than a reformed smoker. In order to give it up, you have to convince yourself it’s a total waste of time. You have to reacquire the disgust you felt towards smoking before you ever started. The more effectively you do this, the less well able you are to empathise with the smoker’s mindset. I will not be preaching to anyone about lifestyle choices but I will be recommending the book in the same way I would recommend any other book.

Where my assessment of smoking diverges from Allen Carr’s is that, firstly, I’m really not sure I would say “I wish I’d never started”, which he claims every smoker would. I’d make the analogy that I like living in England, but I don’t wish I was born here so that I could have lived my entire life in England.

Secondly and consequently, I don’t agree with his claim that there is no positive side to smoking. To me, there undoubtedly is. However If I were writing an intended best-selling self-help book about giving up smoking, I might choose to deny the positive too. (There is a chapter titled “The advantages of being a smoker”, followed by a couple of totally blank pages - ha ha)

What I don’t dispute is that the positive effects, both the physical sensation of the elusive “good cigarette” and the social aspects, are massively outweighed by the addictiveness and toxicity of the substance itself.

Anyway, I told my friend Fil about it and he is now reading the book. He said he doesn’t want to give up smoking (which is why I’m surprised and impressed that he’s reading it at all) so it will be interesting to see if the book manages to persuade him that he actually does want to give it up. I can see why people give up after reading it who had no intention of doing so. It does sort of ruin it for you.

I also mentioned it on the phone to Dave, who lives in Spain and smokes like a trooper. He actually has a copy of the book already but hasn’t got around to reading it (a phenomenon specifically dealt with in the book - it is very common) but now claims that he will.

Fil, you should be aware that Dave says that if you can give up, then so can he. I personally think Dave is saying this because he is still afraid to give up and doesn’t believe (and may not even hope) that you choose to give up.

So please give it a go Fil and if you don’t, at least pretend to Dave that you have so that he’s got no excuse. He would benefit from giving up a lot more than you. Or should I say, even more.

The only unfortunate thing about it all is that I will now be one of those annoying cunts who asks “has it got tobacco in it?” when passed a joint. Declining joints will be a new and difficult experience for me but I will do it. On the contract I have signed with myself (good to put these things in writing I find) I have said I will review the joint policy after six months.

Unfortunately with my improved understanding of how it all works, I don’t really see any way I can continue to smoke tobacco in joints. It’s just not a good idea. I know some people do exactly this but notice that those people tend to smoke a lot of joints. I don’t believe anyone is immune to the addictive properties of nicotine, no matter what context they believe they’re smoking it in.

So: don’t congratulate me yet but have no doubt that you will be congratulating me at some point that constitutes more of an achievement than three weeks.

Finally I would like to address an issue that I discussed with the fox family [1] while in Ireland. The issue was that of all the possible problems I could foresee with giving up smoking,  the one I regarded as the most insurmountable was what happens when you’re out in these days of the smoking ban and a fit girl asks you if you want to go for a cigarette. It does happen from time to time, even to me.

To understand the nature of the dilemma, you need to remember that smoking is cool [2] and that in order to impress a fit girl, you will obviously want to convey that you yourself are cool. You will also want to convey that you have something in common, and what better a thing for two people to have in common than being cool? All of this from the simple act of smoking a cigarette.

The solution is of course that if the fit girl asked if I wanted to go outside for a cigarette, I would go outside and keep her company while she smokes but not smoke myself. I may choose to reveal that I used to smoke cigarettes, after all it is better to have been cool once but then ceased to be, than to never have been cool at all.

But thinking about it some more: cigarettes are addictive and conquering an addiction is difficult and people who do difficult things are cool. Climbing mountains, learning musical instruments, etc. Perhaps I could still convince her I was cool. It depends how intelligent she is. Maybe I’d start talking to her about German minimal techno or something.

[1] My new collective term for the inseparable unit that is Crystalfox and Jane (Sorry Jane)

[2] As an example of Carr’s denial of the positive aspects of smoking, you will not find a single instance of the word “cool” in any of the book’s 111 pages. This cannot be an accidental oversight.

“Sex and the City” summed up

A reader comment from the BBC News story Is it just the shoes? , concerning the appeal of Sex and the City.

Yawn. Let me sum up EVERY episode of Sex and the City:
- Pretentious woman has self-obsessed issue.
- Pretentious woman discusses self-obsessed issue with equally pretentious friends (assuming they aren’t too busy with their own self-obsessed issue)
-Pretentious woman has experience that either confirms or disproves self-obsessed issue and writes about it.
- Kim Cattrall gets them out.
And that’s pretty much it. Oh, and with lots of shoes.
Stuart, Margate

Well said Stuart from Margate.

Personally I’ve always found watching an entire episode of Sex and the City tends to induce an involuntary, half-hour rape fantasy starring me and whichever one of them happens to be speaking at the time.

What’s particularly bad about the show is:

a) the principal female characters portrayed in it think they’re really attractive when they are, in fact, every man’s worst nightmare in terms of personality  - and not particularly blessed in the looks department to compensate

b) impressionable women may watch it and think that this is how attractive, successful women ought to behave

In fact I guarantee you that the same impressionable Dublin 4 morons who started talking like characters out of Friends when that came out are probably all loike, “Oh my god, I saw the most fabulous pair of Manolos in BTs” these days.

NB Sex and the City is Crystalfox’s favourite programme

Great tits

One more before bedtime. I notice that at this moment the most popular story on the BBC News website, both in terms of email forwards and page views, is this:

Great tits cope well with warming

Do people really see the headline and have to click on it, you know, just in case?

Banksy and friends

A brief account of the events of bank holiday Monday just past and how they came to be.

When I was last at The End (for Laurent Garnier - which I only feel I’ve mentally recovered from in the past week or so) I happened to meet two very nice people towards the end of the night, Lorraine and Rami. Lorraine is from the Isle of Wight originally but has been living in London for a long time and seems  cockneyfied as a jar of jellied eels to me. She is, like myself, without occupation and, like myself, seems to be enjoying life as a result. Rami is from Denmark but also lives in London and works as a cameraman.

I very nearly lost them at the end of the night but by a stroke of luck they re-appeared just when I was about to give up and go home. After leaving we went down to the Embankment, sat on a bench and had a few cups of tea, a spliff and a chat.

Before setting home with my jaw firmly clenched, I gave Lorraine my phone number and she said she’d give me a shout next time she was doing something interesting. To her credit, she did exactly that. On Sunday she informed me of this exhibition of work by Banksy and some of his fellow graffiti artists. Monday was the final day of the exhibition held in the underground Leake Street, near Waterloo. You can see a rather unremarkable “before” photo of it here, which I happened to take and post last year.

Monday was another beautiful day. I realised what I like about London in the summer (or rather, in an extended period of good weather) is not so much the effect on my own mood, but other people’s. Although hot weather only exacerbates certain kinds of London misery (such as being on a crowded peak-time Central line train in stifling heat, with someone’s sweaty armpit stuck in your face) it definitely lifts the mood of the city in general. So it was on Monday.

The actual day’s events have already been humorously described on the blog of another of Lorraine’s friends whom I met that day. Keeping with the convention he uses on his own, similarly anonymous blog, we shall refer to him as D. I was going to link to his story but I realised that this would then reveal the identity of “L” and “R” on D’s site. I think we’re fighting a losing battle on the identity obfuscation but for the moment, I’ll leave out the link. D’s blog is of greater intellectual merit than mine -  not a LOLcat in sight. He has however recently posted a story about acid and green tea.

After our very enjoyable afternoon on the south bank of the Thames, spent critiquing other people’s courageous fashion decisions, we headed off to the exhibition where we met Rami.

We had to queue for half an hour or so but once I got inside I was absolutely blown away - I think we all were. The conditions weren’t ideal for photography due to the massive crowd and fluorescent lighting. The former was the real problem. If you wanted to get enough distance to take a photo of a large work, you had to wait several minutes and dish out a lot of dirty looks in order to get clear line of sight for a few seconds. I saw several people in the queue who’d brought tripods along - I didn’t see anyone brave enough to actually use them.

The initial outdoor photos were taken at ISO 100 with my 50-135mmf2.8 DA* [1].

Once we got inside and I realised that 50mm wasn’t working at all (a conclusion which took me a few minutes, unfortunately) the rest are taken at ISO 400 with my 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 DA. These are taken mostly without flash at very slow shutters [2] and hence are not especially sharp but given the subject matter I think it doesn’t detract too much - enjoy.

Banksy - Cans Festival

EDIT: I originally created this as a WordPress gallery (a promising feature they’ve just launched) but have been forced to get rid of it and go with an external Flickr gallery instead. I couldn’t figure out how to make it display the full size pictures (or anything remotely close to full size) when you click on the thumbnails. Neither can quite a few other people it seems.

Rami had to leave the exhibition slightly early as he had a football game to go to. Afterwards Lorraine, D and I went to an Indian cafe/restaurant near Elephant and Castle on her recommendation. It’s a great place and the food was just amazing. It’s very similar in feel to the Turkish cafe/restaurants you get in Dalston. It had the same informality about it - the kind of place where you wouldn’t feel at all self-conscious about eating on your own.

We had a nice chat, much of it concerned with literature. Turns out they’re both big readers, especially in the realm of science fiction (a genre I have more or less ignored) which meant I walked away from the evening with a lengthy list of (passionately and convincingly) recommended reading - some sci-fi, some not. I will report back on this at a later date.

When put on the spot about my favourite author, the best I could come up with was Ian McEwan. To someone who’s read a lot of books, saying your favourite author is Ian McEwan is probably like telling me your favourite band is Coldplay but actually, I’ve had a think about it since and I still can’t think of anyone I enjoy more consistently than Ian McEwan. Actually I don’t think there is the same correlation between selling millions of copies and almost certainly being shit with books as there is with music.

We also touched on the subject of actors and their peculiarities, since both Lorraine and D have been involved in theatre (not treading the boards though, if I remember correctly). I was telling them of some of my own experiences with Cuntfeatures and Girl Housemate Who I Never Assigned A Snappy Title To But Was Also A Total Bitch.

D very astutely pointed out that one of the other hazards with ac-torrrrs besides their total untrustworthiness was their fondness for having threesomes. I was thrilled to be able to tell him that such a threesome had taken place under my very own roof.

Anyway, if you’re reading, D it was a pleasure to meet you and I’m sure I’ll be seeing more of you guys over the coming months.

It’s bright now and people are starting to get up to drive around and shout at each other and generally ruin eveything so I am off to bed. I’m going to Fiona’s (Maria’s lesbian life partner) birthday party tomorrow (technically today) in Leicester and may come home via Birmingham on the way back to see my aunt.

Then, the task of finding a new freak-mate begins in earnest.

[1] This is the one that D was impressed with, leading him to assume that I must know what I’m doing. This is exactly what I hoped people will assume. This, along with the fact that it’s a very fast and damn sharp lens, is part of the reason I bought it. If you look like a proper photographer, people will a) nearly always agree to let you take their photo and b) do what you tell them in the process of doing it. Actually living up to people’s assumptions about your level of skill can follow later. Hopefully.

[2] The shake-reduction on my camera is really effective. The Pentax version is in the body rather than the lens hence you don’t see the results through the viewfinder but with the benefit that it works on any lens. Without it there’s no way you could take usable photos at 1/20s - or in a few cases here, even slower.

David Shrigley - genius

The illustration from this month’s Tate bulletin:

I got a book of his postcards for xmas

The importance of admitting defeat in politics

I was pleased to see that the game is up for Hillary Clinton, in the opinion of everyone other than Ms Clinton herself at least.

But closer to home - just across the road in fact - my neighbour shows an unwillingness to concede electoral defeat that Robert Mugabe would be proud of.

In the weeks preceding the election, he had every window of his house covered in a mixture of “Vote Labour” and “Vote Ken Livingstone” posters.

These are freely available in the run-up to an election for anyone who feels strongly enough about a particular candidate to turn their house into a political advertisement. Who would be influenced by such posters I can’t imagine.

I was tempted to get some Brian Paddick posters for our house just because I liked the thought of our neighbour concluding, correctly, that I was only doing it to piss him off (since our house is directly opposite his and nobody else on the street had any up). Alas laziness got the better of me.

Anyway, he’s taken them all down except, curiously, for one, pictured below.

Look at it, shining on from the top floor like a tiny beacon of democracy, a flame that burns eternally in memory of the third term that could, nay should, have been.

I am thinking of taking up the violin just so I can learn one very sad song which I will stand beneath his window and play over and over until Boris is impeached or he takes down the goddamn sign.

Whichever comes first.

It is now^H^H^Hnever safe to shut down your computer

So, not the best start to what I promised would be a productive month of blogging.

Since Stu moved out, I decided I might as well take his room. It is the same size as my room but it has a much higher ceiling and if there’s one thing I like in a room, it’s a high ceiling. It’s also lower down in the house than my room meaning it will hopefully be cooler than my previous room in the searingly hot summer I know we’re going to have.

This process of moving all my worldly possessions about 10 metres has already entailed a massive amount of work (it would appear that my day-to-day activities require no fewer than 15 electrical outlets, for instance) and is still not complete. As I powered off my computer for about the fith time in its life, I thought to myself “I hope it starts up again” [*] - while not believing that there was any real chance it might not.

I moved it down to its new home, having cleaned a whole warren of dust bunnies out of the case, and about twelve hours later when I restored the power, there wasn’t a goddamn peep out of it.

One thing that has always put me in a mood of absolute despair is a broken computer. It was especially bad back in the bad old days of only having one computer but even today it’s a major pain in the ass. It’s partly the feeling of insecurity that comes from being without one’s preferred computer and partly the sense of betrayal: how dare it break without warning, after all I’ve done for it and all we’ve been through together?

The diagnostic process only made the situation worse since I accidentally yanked the CPU out of its socket without unlocking it (while trying to remove just the heatsink - the two had welded together) and since you can’t replace a CPU with a heatsink attached to it, I ended up having to prise them apart with a big kitchen knife and a large amount of force. That a delicate piece of ceramic and silicon and 754 tiny golden pins should survive this process is every bit as much of a miracle as it sounds. Must have been the anti-static wrist strap.

What’s particularly annoying is that it decided to start working again, with some persuasion and without any definite explanation, just after I had conducted a couple of hours’ research into what I would buy in its place. I hadn’t planned on replacing my computer until after my holidays since my strategy has generally to buy in close to the top of the range and then retain the system for four years (this machine’s four years won’t be up until September) before replacing again.

However, having brought myself up to speed with the latest happenings in the processor world, I had psyched myself up to making the unforeseen investment of a new motherboard, processor and RAM and was actually quite looking forward to having a shiny new multi-core box.

Still, I’m pleased it’s working again and hopefully I won’t have to shut it down again for quite a while. It also means I won’t have a fancy machine sitting in storage depreciating heavily while I’m away.

[*] This is a common time for a system to fail - generally attributed to thermal stress. On a previous occasion when I shut down my computer to install a new hard disk, the PSU blew up when I restored the power. Having it happen twice in three years is still bad luck, mind.

Exhibited each afternoon during September

I discovered this sad and disturbing story via digg.

In 1906 the Bronx Zoo in New York held an exhibition in their monkey house to demonstrate, amongst other things, the theory of evolution. In this exhibition a 23-year-old Congolese pygmy man named Ota Benga was put on display alongside an orang-utan. Although the exhibition immediately provoked criticism, it was almost entirely from within the black community.

Scandal at the zoo (New York Times)

Wikipedia article

It’s the fact that all this happened a mere century ago that I find really surprising. Evidently it wasn’t until after WWII that this sort of thing became unacceptable to the average member of the public.

Here are two other interesting stories also from digg:

The first is about five interesting psychological experiments that reveal sinister aspects of human behaviour. You have probably heard about some if not all of these already. The last one, the Stanford Prison Experiment, is the basis for the German film Das Experiment which is well worth watching.

The second is far less depressing and describes an amazing fruit (it’s called “miracle fruit”, in fact) that, after eating it, makes everything you eat subsequently taste much sweeter. It hasn’t been genetically modified or anything, it’s just not very well-known as it’s native to West Africa. I look forward to trying it.

No news is Fox News

It is rare that any politician strikes me as decent, honest and worthy of absolute trust. Why that’d be just silly. Some of them though, seem so transparently opportunistic and fake that you would wonder how even some of the people could be fooled some of the time. Hillary Clinton is one such politican.

As with David Cameron, I mentally picture a little pie chart floating above her head with every sentence she utters, showing the demographic it’s supposed to appeal to and the sentiment it is designed to reinforce.

This story from The Ecomomist blog, linking the Clinton campaign to an organised effort to mislead poor, black voters into not voting, doesn’t come as a great suprise to me. Clinton is a woman on a mission - as shown by her camp’s ongoing smear campaign against Obama which has gone largely unreciprocated.

Even with their utterly broken media and somewhat broken electoral system, I struggle to believe that our friends across the pond could elect a warmongering redneck moron like John McCain. However, I remember thinking the same about the warmongering redneck moron they returned for a second term in 2004. As we’ve just discovered here in London, people can do crazy, inexplicable things at election time.

I used to believe that Americans who vote Republican are making an informed decision similar to that made by Britons who vote Conservative. The basis for this informed decision would be something along the lines of “We’ve got lots of money and we’d like to hang onto as much of it as possible” [*]

I realise now that those in America who are poor enough to be reliant on the “mainstream media” for their news - and there are quite a few of them - are so utterly brainwashed that they really can’t be held responsible for their actions at the polling booth. By appealing to their sense of patriotism (or fears surrounding immigration or national security), the turkeys can be very effectively persuaded to vote for Christmas.

The consensus from the online discussion surrounding the story linked to above is that it stands no chance of an airing in the “MSM” and that is a great tragedy for the American people.

This is a good opportunity to mention one of my favourite cartoons, This Modern World. It goes overy my head on occasion (though not as often as Doonesbury) but the fundamental theme is the same every week: how American politicians and the media conspire to divert political debate away from actual issues in favour of liberal-vs-conservative bickering.

Here are the two most recent cartoons at the time of writing. NB Depending on your screen resolution you may need to click on these to open them in a new window in order to see the whole thing.

Finally regarding the post title, here is a thorough analysis of the political bias displayed by Fox News which makes for rather depressing reading.

[*] Good luck to David Cameron in his attempt to rebrand the core message to “I vote Conservative because I care about little fluffy bunny rabbits and the lush green fields they scamper around in”. I’m not buying it, Dave, but I’m sure you’ll find plenty of wealthy tofu-weavers in my part of town who will.